[Nix-dev] Making stdenv/setup.sh more verbose
Michael Raskin
7c6f434c at mail.ru
Fri Jan 20 14:32:15 CET 2012
>I disagree. What useful information do most of these communicate? E.g. if a
>mkdir succeeds, why do I have to be informed about it? It's only interesting if
>it fails.
>
>Rob actually just suggested to make the unpackPhase less verbose, i.e. drop the
>"-v" flag in "tar" and "cp". But maybe that should be optional.
OK, dropping -v both for tar and mkdir is a good idea. But I always
thought that -v for tar was deliberate (and mkdir -v is less relative
verbosity than tar -v). mkdir -v is a balance improvement after that.
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list