[Nix-dev] Making stdenv/setup.sh more verbose
Yury G. Kudryashov
urkud.urkud at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 15:00:36 CET 2012
Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/01/12 07:01, Michael Raskin wrote:
>
>>> Review the attached patch, please.
>>
>> Looks like a strict improvement..
>
> I disagree. What useful information do most of these communicate? E.g.
> if a
> mkdir succeeds, why do I have to be informed about it? It's only
> interesting if it fails.
>
> Rob actually just suggested to make the unpackPhase less verbose, i.e.
> drop the
> "-v" flag in "tar" and "cp". But maybe that should be optional.
I prefer to see what happens during the build even if everything succeeds.
E.g., I don't like if a build script creates a directory behind the scenes
(i.e., without any output).
>
>>> + mkdir -pv $out/bin
>>> + cp -v "$@" $out/bin
>
> This actually made me wonder why we have an "installBin" function in
> stdenv. It doesn't appear to be used anywhere in Nixpkgs...
Then we can remove this function.
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: urkud at mccme.ru
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list