[Nix-dev] Re: Re: kde/phonon vs qt/phonon

Yury G. Kudryashov urkud+nix at ya.ru
Thu Aug 12 10:45:41 CEST 2010


Michael Raskin wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 08/12/2010 01:41 AM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>> Slightly less ugly hack: right after unpacking Qt replace phonon with
>>> upstream stable release.
>> One of the problems is Qt buildsystem. They install phonon headers into a
>> different location etc.
> 
> I'd diff KDE tarball and Qt tarball. If the differences are small - just
> replace and redo the changes by a sed script. If they are small - maybe
> keep using Qt versions.
> 
> By the way, you can build the three parts (Qt, Phonon, QtWebkit) by
> three expressions and just symlink them together to avoid KDE build
> problems.

KDE asks qmake for the prefix. Actually I hope that it should be sufficient 
to remove some NO_DEFAULT_PATH strings in FindQt4.cmake but I'm not sure.




More information about the nix-dev mailing list