[Nix-dev] Which option replaces security.setuidOwners?

[Tomasz Czyż]

Actually, very strange that such a huge change has no documentation changes
at all.

Good thing is, there were some tests :)

2017-02-14 22:07 GMT+00:00 Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman at gmail.com>:

> On 14 February 2017 at 23:04, Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 14 February 2017 at 22:51, Domen Kožar <domen at dev.si> wrote:
> >> We need to use renames for backwards compatibility then :)
> >
> > A rename implies same signature under different namespace (AFAICS).
> > This is not the case here, because the option types are different.
> >
> > I've got a local change that is about to be pushed:
> >
> > +    (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidOwners" ] "Use
> > security.wrappers instead")
> > +    (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidPrograms" ] "Use
> > security.wrappers instead")
> >
> > (I also do some other fixups that was wrt. new security.wrapper to
> > make my NixOS build.)
>
> I created PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22806
>
> Best regards,
> Bjørn Forsman
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>



-- 
Tomasz Czyż
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20170214/f17303db/attachment.html>