[Nix-dev] Which option replaces security.setuidOwners?

[Bjørn Forsman]

On 14 February 2017 at 23:04, Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 February 2017 at 22:51, Domen Kožar <domen at dev.si> wrote:
>> We need to use renames for backwards compatibility then :)
>
> A rename implies same signature under different namespace (AFAICS).
> This is not the case here, because the option types are different.
>
> I've got a local change that is about to be pushed:
>
> +    (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidOwners" ] "Use
> security.wrappers instead")
> +    (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidPrograms" ] "Use
> security.wrappers instead")
>
> (I also do some other fixups that was wrt. new security.wrapper to
> make my NixOS build.)

I created PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22806

Best regards,
Bjørn Forsman