[Nix-dev] Proposal: Highly available security-specific trusted build infrastructure

[zimbatm]

What is the minimal replacement for Hydra. nix-build + dynamic remote
builders + nar s3 upload?

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 at 18:53 Kevin Cox <kevincox at kevincox.ca> wrote:

> On 16/10/16 18:32, Shea Levy wrote:
> > I think an automated system would be nicer, but yes this would resolve
> > the majority of my concern here.
> >
>
> I understand but I think Hydra works more then 95% of the time.
> Designing an automated system for the rare case when we need to push an
> emergency update sounds like it is unlikely to be fruitful. I think that
> if we are trying to create a backup for an automated system it would be
> beneficial to go quite bare bones.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20161016/80931123/attachment-0001.html>