[Nix-dev] Proposal: Highly available security-specific trusted build infrastructure

Kevin Cox kevincox at kevincox.ca
Sun Oct 16 19:53:27 CEST 2016


On 16/10/16 18:32, Shea Levy wrote:
> I think an automated system would be nicer, but yes this would resolve
> the majority of my concern here.
> 

I understand but I think Hydra works more then 95% of the time.
Designing an automated system for the rare case when we need to push an
emergency update sounds like it is unlikely to be fruitful. I think that
if we are trying to create a backup for an automated system it would be
beneficial to go quite bare bones.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20161016/16384df2/attachment.sig>


More information about the nix-dev mailing list