[Nix-dev] Again: Why don't these people have commit access

[Nathan Bijnens]

While I don't mind that we expand the number of people with commit access,
I firmly oppose doing changes directly on master, any change should first
be a PR. If there're more people who can close a PR, those PRs will be open
for a shorter amount of time.

Nathan.

---
nathan at nathan.gs | nathan.gs
<http://nathan.gs?utm_source=footer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=n> |
@nathan_gs <http://twitter.com/nathan_gs> | linkedin.com/in/nbijnens

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:11 PM, stewart mackenzie <setori88 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I firmly support Michael Raskin, expanding maintainers widens the
> bottleneck.
>
> Kind regards
> Stewart
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150118/56986b8a/attachment.html