[Nix-dev] Why are there so many branches in the nixpkgs repo

Matthias Beyer mail at beyermatthias.de
Sat Feb 21 17:44:03 CET 2015


On 18-02-2015 22:20:21, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 09:51 AM, Nathan Bijnens wrote:
> >    My vote is to remove merged branches without historical significance
> >    (version 0.5 is a keeper, like upstart), and then any branches that
> >    got their last push before August 2014 are renamed to attic/...
> >
> >First make a fork with all history. Afterwards I like Wout's suggestion.
> 
> Removing merged branches doesn't destroy history.
> BTW, historically significant versions that aren't meant to be changed
> anymore might better be converted to tags.

+1 !

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Kind regards,
Matthias Beyer

Proudly sent with mutt.
Happily signed with gnupg.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150221/0b1ba803/attachment.bin 


More information about the nix-dev mailing list