[Nix-dev] Why are there so many branches in the nixpkgs repo
Vladimír Čunát
vcunat at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 22:20:21 CET 2015
On 02/18/2015 09:51 AM, Nathan Bijnens wrote:
> My vote is to remove merged branches without historical significance
> (version 0.5 is a keeper, like upstart), and then any branches that
> got their last push before August 2014 are renamed to attic/...
>
> First make a fork with all history. Afterwards I like Wout's suggestion.
Removing merged branches doesn't destroy history.
BTW, historically significant versions that aren't meant to be changed
anymore might better be converted to tags.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3251 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150218/c367aff9/attachment.bin
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list