[Nix-dev] RFC: three dying pull requests (let's keep them alive)

[Raahul Kumar]

One note:

* edolstra <https://github.com/edolstra> * commented on Feb 28
<https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/213#issuecomment-36334864>

Probably best to do it after 1.7.
 So Eelco is okay with a merge of recursive nix.

https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/213

I'm impressed by the volume of work Shea has done. John, since Eelco had a
look, I think it's probably worth a merge.


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:43 AM, John Wiegley <johnw at newartisans.com> wrote:

> >>>>> Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> writes:
>
> > Recursive nix is unused because it was unfinished and it was too much
> > potential work to keep going without some sign it would be merged.
>
> Then I vote for a review of recursive nix, and to merge in the other two as
> they stand.
>
> Can you help me understand recursive nix a bit more?  I'm willing to dig
> into
> it with some intro.
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20140828/918c2a2c/attachment-0001.html