[Nix-dev] RFC: three dying pull requests (let's keep them alive)

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> writes:

> Recursive nix is unused because it was unfinished and it was too much
> potential work to keep going without some sign it would be merged.

Then I vote for a review of recursive nix, and to merge in the other two as
they stand.

Can you help me understand recursive nix a bit more?  I'm willing to dig into
it with some intro.

John