[Nix-dev] [***SPAM***] Re: Nixpkgs and NixOS moved to GitHub
Eelco Dolstra
eelco.dolstra at logicblox.com
Thu Jun 21 23:14:40 CEST 2012
Hi,
On 21/06/12 17:16, Michael Raskin wrote:
>>> > - A centralised workflow where people commit directly into the
>>> > master. This is basically what we did with Subversion. The downside
>>> > is a lack of review.
>>> I am very much in favor of this approach because it forces the least
>>> amount of administrative overhead on regular contributors while still
>>> leaving the door open for non-regular contributors to submit patches via
>>> pull requests. Personally, I do not want to open a pull request for
>>> every little change I make.
>> That's what I'd prefer too.
>
> Because it is the only solution that doesn't make existing problems
> worse (it is, in my opinion)?
What problems are you talking about, and how would other approaches make them worse?
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list