[Nix-dev] Video Driver Name Mismatch

Michael Raskin 7c6f434c at mail.ru
Thu Jan 22 06:16:28 CET 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Altobelli wrote:
> The problem is that if I enter the knownVideoDriver as radeonhd in
> configuration.nix, it goes to the radeonhd version 1.2.1 which does
> not have the xf86videoradeonhd_124 naming convention.  I basically
> changed the name xf86videoradeonhd to xf86videoradeonhd_121 and
> xf86videoradeonhd_124 to xf86videoradeonhd and the new version works
> flawlessly.  I notice that video-ati uses this naming convention, does
> this mean only the oldest version can be loaded?  I would think it
> should look for the newest version installed on the machine?

Default is the version from X.org release. The rest is provided for the
ease of using different types of override. I do not like the __override
solution, so I created the option for changing used driver in X job.
Look it up in my configuration.nix in configurations/

> On a side note, is it necessary to have every video in one nix file,
> eventually with all the versions this is going to give pretty big.

For most cards latest X.org is enough


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJeAEpAAoJEE6tnN0aWvw3LVUH+gNeIhGJKj7qSTCxgpECD8yB
FQGCu7g1qjKHZgFFqL0MW6/GEUsF0MrOB62DKnMJ3Myncb7yRGeXtDr08HHseMyJ
4eyaRnuFI8hqFal5TvkwF+GWKSzaFcJNzm64tjiZx3S7RMTzgPKtPR9l1mod1TFO
PtpTMWSXZmsw6lH+Uf/UTQbC7w4E4FNyAWgjCJBGighQL23AOVp4CRHbGUj74E4z
GHCTdYOTzsFThbN4guvstLozAIATfVaqp+jE92+25wFs3PYyKEapivKJj9sRtutW
yK1bEx/oJLhmmgyO13H4Pp0hXkae9fq0Woqviw3xM96CdGxMo3Troq9w6IEjsr0=
=Ak1l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the nix-dev mailing list