[Nix-dev] What about introducing deprecated or such an attr name?
Eelco Dolstra
e.dolstra at tudelft.nl
Wed Nov 19 23:05:34 CET 2008
Marc Weber wrote:
> Eg there are some expressions which should be preferred over others.
> Examples:
>
> tetex is discontinued, but you have to ask wikipedia to get to know
> that...
>
> cdrecord didn't build, so why did nobody complain? Maybe everyone is
> using cdrdao now? Why not add this as well?
>
> So what about adding something like
>
> meta = {
> depreceated = "use texLive instead, tetex is discontinued";
> };
> ?
>
> Do you like this idea? Or is there already an alternative?
What would be the semantics of such an attribute? Should nix-env print a
warning when you try to install a package with a deprecated attribute? You
could also put such information in the description attribute.
While on the subject, we could have an attribute that specifies that one package
is a replacement of some other, removed package. E.g. if we remove tetex, we
could say in texlive something like
meta = {
upgrades = ["tetex"];
};
and then if you do a nix-env -u \*, tetex would be upgraded to texlive
automatically.
This could also be useful for handling package renames. For instance, I want to
rename MPlayer to mplayer, but that's not really supported right now.
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list