[Nix-dev] Is it okay to make bison-2.3 the default?

[Eelco Dolstra]

Hi,

Peter Simons wrote:

> currently, "bison" is bison 1.1875. I updated that to version 2.3 in my
> local tree a while ago and experienced no problems, so I'd like to
> check-in that change. Does anyone see a reason not to do that?

No, it should be fine.  Then we can finally get rid of all those "bison =
bison23" lines.  If there are packages that really need 1.1875, the build farm
will tell us :-)

-- 
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/