[Nix-dev] Re: [OT] Re: I broke the buildfarm again - how to fix for the future?

[Michael Raskin]

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> before describing what this was about ;-)), and sounded like an
> after-the-fact justification (the code was already in).
> 
> (I'm not offering much technical help for the moment, just giving my
> impressions on the way you "introduced" us to this.)

Well, if not for missed files, it would be a conservative extension
(everyone is free to ignore it).

So in current state (few developers, few packages) it is OK for
non-breaking changes