[Nix-dev] Is CI of pull requests broken?

[Maarten Hoogendoorn]

Hopefully we can move soonish to a setup where maintainers (who have commit
access to the NixOS repo) can trigger a build on a hydraulic setup.

@grahamc, what's the timeline for that :)?

Op 9 apr. 2017 20:47 schreef "Layus" <layus.on at gmail.com>:

> On 09/04/17 11:13, Florent Becker wrote:
>
> Moreover, many of the merged pull requests [2] also have failed CI. It
> looks like the failed CI signal nothing to the people who do merge.
> Everybody just knows that CI is broken and its success or failure
> means nothing. Is it so?
>
> Failure means nothing, but success means the changes are not (too)
> broken. So it's not quite useless.
>
> Some failures are meaningful. It only takes a quick glance to tell if the
> failure is some kind of bustage or a real issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20170410/ab6ff54e/attachment-0001.html>