[Nix-dev] Nixpkgs versioning
Tomasz Czyż
tomasz.czyz at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 16:42:28 CEST 2016
Vladimir: true.
There is any rule for transforming app name + version to attribute name?
underscores and dashes are ok in attribute names but versions mostly use
dots (not sure if replacing them with underscore or dash is a good idea as
those chars are used in version strings as well).
I assume adding/allowing more chars in attribute names will make parsing
more difficult, it that the limiting factor?
2016-03-30 13:41 GMT+00:00 Vladimír Čunát <vcunat at gmail.com>:
> On 03/30/2016 12:02 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
> > Besides, I thought the universally agreed best way forward was to drop
> > the notion of installing packages "by name" from the CLI anyway?
>
> True, we push towards using attribute names instead. There can be
> version embedded in attribute names, e.g. we have llvm_37, but `@` makes
> little sense in there...
>
> --Vladimir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
>
--
Tomasz Czyż
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160330/19f8d36d/attachment.html
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list