[Nix-dev] dist-upgrade? define channel declaratively?

Ericson, John john_ericson at brown.edu
Tue Jan 19 00:04:02 CET 2016


Hmm, I think we should strive to keep nix as minimal as possible. This is
definitely the killer app for the builtin.fetch*.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:51 AM, stewart mackenzie <setori88 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 15 Jan 2016 19:17, "Eelco Dolstra" <eelco.dolstra at logicblox.com> wrote:
> > Another possibility would be to build the module system into Nix, so
> module
> > evaluation wouldn't depend on Nixpkgs.
>
> this seems to be a better longterm solution.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160118/d67b93d8/attachment.html 


More information about the nix-dev mailing list