[Nix-dev] Flattening pkgs tree in nixpkgs/pkgs

Vladimír Čunát vcunat at gmail.com
Fri Jan 8 15:58:50 CET 2016


On 01/08/2016 02:53 PM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
> I think the categories/directories could make more sense than they do
> today, and that all-packages.nix should be abolished

The largest problem I see for categorization is ambiguity (mentioned
already). The "categories" will always overlap nontrivially, so we would
better track such information in a different way than directory
structure, e.g. meta.tags = [ "foo" "bar" "baz" ]; (perhaps even
hierarchical tags).

Currently a significant portion of our packages is in
pkgs/development/libraries/ - which is a rather bad category IMO. If I
didn't use tab-completion, I would've pushed this issue hard long time
ago already.

Personally, I would make it much flatter and also make it (almost)
exactly correspond to our *attribute* hierarchy.

We had some discussion around this on NixCon. IMO best time to execute
this will be during release stabilization to minimize cherry-pick
conflicts due to file renames, but first we need a clear consensus.


Vladimir


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3771 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160108/a0fbf79c/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the nix-dev mailing list