[Nix-dev] Flattening pkgs tree in nixpkgs/pkgs

[Tomasz Czyż]

As Mathnerd314 said, filesystem layout != attribute layout. This should
still work as right now.

2016-01-08 1:39 GMT+00:00 Jookia <166291 at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:29:35PM -0700, Mathnerd314 wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Jookia <166291 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:38:52AM +0000, Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> > > > 2016-01-08 0:34 GMT+00:00 Jonn Mostovoy <jm at memorici.de>:
> > > > Still don't see the value in it. I would just prefix them with
> > > > haskellPackages-<name>, pythonPackages-<name>.
> > >
> > > How would we do something like 'buildInputs = with pythonPackages;
> > > [pycrypto]; '
> > > with that kind of system? I imagine things would get very verbose very
> > > quickly.
> > >
> >
> > We would still have all-packages.nix, so the attribute paths would not
> > change.
> >
> > -- Mathnerd314
>
> Would this still work with conflicting namespaces, such as Python3Packages?
>



-- 
Tomasz Czyż
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160108/1011bfec/attachment.html