[Nix-dev] Perl -> C++

zimbatm zimbatm at zimbatm.com
Fri Jan 1 18:04:31 CET 2016


C++ supports on whole lot more platforms than the proposed alternatives. If
Nix is to become a universal package manager it seems important as a
feature.
That being said, we're bound to have security issues if the nix-daemon is
it's written in an unsafe language.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 at 11:36 Luca Bruno <lethalman88 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nix is already C++. It's just that some tools are written in perl. Nix
> certainly isn't going to be rewritten in another language, at this time
> would be a waste of efforts in my opinion.
> The perl->c++ is about reducing the nix closure even more, but translating
> perl tools to c++.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Tomasz Czyż <tomasz.czyz at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Domen, I think this evolved from why perl -> c++ not perl -> X. Not sure
>> this went to nix -> X.
>> But if decision was already made that c++ is the one, probably discussion
>> is over :)?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160101/a75e8635/attachment.html 


More information about the nix-dev mailing list