[Nix-dev] 6 month C4 adoption period

Roger Qiu roger.qiu at matrix.ai
Tue Aug 30 11:38:27 CEST 2016


It would be useful if those revision hashes were paired with a date.


On 30/08/2016 7:34 PM, Shea Levy wrote:
> Hi Stewart,
>
> If you go to
> http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-16.03/nixpkgs.rustUnstable.rustc.x86_64-linux/latest/eval#tabs-inputs,
> you can see the nixpkgs revision of the latest successful build of
> rustUnstable. If you ensure that your nixpkgs is not later then that,
> you should always get binaries. If you don't, please report back with
> your nixpkgs.config.
>
> ~Shea
>
> stewart mackenzie <setori88 at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I just want this issue resolved.
>>
>> Every time I update / upgrade I recompile rustBeta then rustUnstable
>> and it results in 1/2 day lost. This has happened frequently, recently
>> as rustUnstable and rustBeta have been broken for a long time.
>> (ie days have been lost finding working revs then compiling rust)
>>
>> If the lowprio removal doesn't solve this then how can I get it such
>> that when I issue a `nixos-rebuild --upgrade switch` and my
>> configuration.nix contains `rustUnstable.rustc`  downloads these
>> binaries http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-16.03/nixpkgs.rustUnstable.rustc.x86_64-linux.
>>
>> What exactly does lowprio do?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

-- 
Founder of Matrix AI
https://matrix.ai/
+61420925975

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160830/08781695/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the nix-dev mailing list