[Nix-dev] Logo improvement ideas
Tim Cuthbertson
tim at gfxmonk.net
Thu Sep 10 14:34:35 CEST 2015
If nobody authoritative wants to set up a poll, I can certainly do one :)
I'm a little bit busy at the moment, but as long as we're not in a hurry...
To prevent overwhelming people with options, and after letting these
stew for a little while, I'd be happy to limit choices to:
* shapes: just circle and hex. I think circle is strictly better than
"straight", and I think "slant" is too disorganised / unclean to be a
winner.
* colours: "feature" and "half". The plain versions are probably too
boring to bother with.
So that only leaves 4 proposals, across those two axis. I can include
more if people think it's worth it, but I don't want to overwhelm.
I've made a start here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1oMKuPCIz5bmUokrN6mllYpIDH7cmVQTzuZAcUdGH1HM/viewform
Please DO NOT COMPLETE THIS POLL (until it's finished), I'm just
posting here to solicit feedback. I obviously need to populate the
rest of the images, but is there anything else we want to ask? Is
anything phrased poorly?
Is it OK to require a google login? I'm assuming everyone has access
to one, and it'd prevent the laziest attempts at skewing the results.
Cheers,
- Tim.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Joachim Schiele <js at lastlog.de> wrote:
> On 09.09.2015 13:19, Oliver Charles wrote:
>> I'm in favour of the logo change, I think all the presented ones are
>> great candidates for a new logo, and also really like the half-hex
>> version. A poll sounds good, maybe we could use one of those online poll
>> services, and have NixOS tweet a link/have a blog post appear in the planet?
>
> sounds great, who does it?
>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:37 AM Rob Vermaas <rob.vermaas at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rob.vermaas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps someone can set up a poll or something and engage people to
>> vote for it, to see if people prefer to stay with the old logo, or if
>> a new logo is preferred.
>>
>> Personally, I like the old logo better, but that's just my opinion :)
>> (The new logo also looks nice btw)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rob
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Nicolas Pierron
>> <nicolas.b.pierron at gmail.com <mailto:nicolas.b.pierron at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Guillaume Maudoux (Layus)
>> > <layus.on at gmail.com <mailto:layus.on at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> Tim has invested some time in making great logos, and everybody
>> seems to like the hex-half version.
>> >> It would be too sad to loose his job, so what is the next step ?
>> >> Who is authorized to do such a modification ?
>> >
>> > I don't think there is any precedent. The last time was when we
>> > settled on the first logo:
>> >
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2009-October/003231.html
>> > (and replies)
>> >
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2009-November/003326.html
>> > (and replies)
>> >
>> > I think the board of the NixOS foundation might have the last word,
>> > based on the community choices.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Nicolas Pierron
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolasbpierron - http://nbp.name/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nix-dev mailing list
>> > nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl <mailto:nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl>
>> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Vermaas
>>
>> [email] rob.vermaas at gmail.com <mailto:rob.vermaas at gmail.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl <mailto:nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl>
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list