[Nix-dev] Decision Procedures

Vladimír Čunát vcunat at gmail.com
Mon Jan 19 19:40:31 CET 2015

On 01/19/2015 02:03 AM, Luca Bruno wrote:
> The problem about being cheap and yet being thought is because basically
> we don't have a policy.  [...]

Yes, generally I certainly feel that the rapidly growing number of 
contributors requires more structure for our workflow and more/better 
docs, so the situation can be managed more efficiently (even soft 
policies; say, explicit guidelines).

We did already some helpful steps (travis for PRs, staging and release 
branches, ...), but we probably need some more.

I agree the controversial issues are relatively painful, but I don't see 
how to help it (though I haven't put much effort into finding out).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3251 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150119/33fccb50/attachment.bin 

More information about the nix-dev mailing list