[Nix-dev] Again: Why don't these people have commit access

Pascal Wittmann PascalWittmann at gmx.net
Sun Jan 18 18:27:39 CET 2015

On 01/18/2015 06:19 PM, Nathan Bijnens wrote:
> While I don't mind that we expand the number of people with commit access,
> I firmly oppose doing changes directly on master, any change should first
> be a PR. If there're more people who can close a PR, those PRs will be open
> for a shorter amount of time.

What is the advantage? IMO this would create an enormous overhead. E.g.
I just updated abiword from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 and only changed the version
number and hash. Is this worth a pull request? I don't want to merge
those pull requests, they only cover the discussion-worthy pull requests.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150118/11720644/attachment.bin 

More information about the nix-dev mailing list