[Nix-dev] /dev/shm inconsistency in chroot
Sree Harsha Totakura
sreeharsha at totakura.in
Fri Jan 24 18:44:33 CET 2014
On 01/24/2014 06:13 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> writes:
>> > Another option is to mount a devtmpfs there, for systems which support it.
devtmpfs may give different devices on each machine and they may hinder
our build reproducibility.
> The thing is, we don't actually want most of the system's devices to be
> in the build environment, do we? These are all impurities. I don't
> think we want /dev/sda, for example.
Sure, I agree. I propose we start enumerating commonly needed devices
and create them. If in future, a package requires access to certain
device while building (or during tests) we can include it in our list of
created device nodes.
Sree
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list