[Nix-dev] How to get rid of systemd (was: Modifying the init system (introducing S6 supervision suite))
Colin Putney
colin at wiresong.com
Mon Dec 29 02:38:41 CET 2014
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ertugrul Söylemez <ertesx at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Instead a lot of services can be treated as a sequence of isolated
> > containers, and a small set of "load-balanced", mutable service entry
> > points. Namespace magic can make a lot of previously global state,
> > local, such as ports, pid-files, log files etc.
> >
> > For these kinds of services, you don't need graceful shutdown, which is a
> > great simplification, similarly to what docker typically provides.
> >
> > I feel that a great design in this area should blend well with
> distributing
> > services across machines, failover, etc. which are concerns that systemd
> > doesn't start to cover.
>
> That's a very good summary of why I want to implement my proposal. Let
> me see if I can get a working prototype.
This sounds a lot like Disnix! How would it be similar? How would it be
different?
-Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20141228/b37dc315/attachment.html
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list