[Nix-dev] Authenticating binary substitutes
Ludovic Courtès
ludo at gnu.org
Wed May 22 22:16:52 CEST 2013
(Re-adding bug-guix at .)
Eelco Dolstra <eelco.dolstra at logicblox.com> skribis:
> On 22/05/13 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Currently the “binary cache” substituter relies on DNS to authenticate
>> downloaded binaries: anything coming from, say, hydra.nixos.org is
>> considered authentic, because hydra.nixos.org is listed in the
>> ‘trusted-binary-cache’ list.
>>
>> This is obviously subject to person-in-the-middle attacks: one could
>> connect over Wifi to somebody else’s network, which happens to redirect
>> hydra.nixos.org to evil.example.com, and end up downloading evil binaries.
>
> There is an issue about this:
>
> https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/75
Ah, good.
>> I was thinking of a simple extension to solve that:
>>
>> 1a. The /nix-cache-info file would contain an (optional)
>> ‘OpenPGPFingerprint’ field, to announce the fingerprint of the
>> OpenPGP key used to sign Nars.
>>
>> 1b. In addition to, or alternatively, a /nix-signing-key file would be
>> served, containing the OpenPGP key used to sign Nars.
>>
>> 2. In addition to serving, say,
>> /nar/zwpx7d0sv36fi4xpwqx2dak0axx5nji8-gmp-5.1.1, the server would
>> also serve /nar/zwpx7d0sv36fi4xpwqx2dak0axx5nji8-gmp-5.1.1.sig, an
>> OpenPGP binary signature of the uncompressed Nar.
>
> How about: rather than relying on nix-cache-info, nix.conf should specify a list
> of fingerprints of trusted OpenPGP signing keys.
Yes (I was focusing on the protocol, to start with.)
> Then when we fetch a .narinfo, we check whether it is signed by a
> trusted key. This way you don't have the problem Lluís described.
I think it’s enough to sign nars. What do you think it would add to
sign narinfos as well?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list