[Nix-dev] consensus (was: Re: Improving the Developer Experience in the Nix Community)

[Florian Friesdorf]

Hi Michael, hi all!

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:41:56 +0400, Michael Raskin <7c6f434c at mail.ru> wrote:
> >I think it is more fruitful to think of the system between us
> >maintainers being anarchy, not democracy and therefore we should be
> >aware of and work with consensus.
> >
> >For a nice description and one implementation of consensus, see:
> >
> >https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Consensus
> 
> It does look that currently it is unattainable as such on some
> questions.

On which questions do you think we currently do not have or cannot reach
consensus?

> Consensus is good when it is feasible, but with some amount of
> differences it is too much to ask for.

regards
florian
-- 
Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net>
  GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D  BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20120630/f19705d4/attachment.bin