[Nix-dev] Distribution compatibility
Mathnerd314
mathnerd314.gph at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 07:11:35 CET 2012
It seems like Nix can be installed on pretty much any system (including
Windows?), but the reverse does not seem possible: why shouldn't one be
able to install any system on NixOS?
In a perfect world, I envision having multiple systems running at the
same time a la Qubes (http://qubes-os.org/trac), all nicely managed
using nix, but a good start is finding a way to stuff Debian's package
repository into NixPkgs.
Currently, it seems like installing Debian packages on NixOS requires
manually writing a derivation, and there are no tools to automate
writing such a derivation. There's also the question of whether the Nix
package format is flexible enough to allow installing/breaking up
packages in something approximating "the Debian way," and whether the
dependency solver in Nix is powerful enough to handle ~26,000 new
packages, each with 3+ versions from the various debian-stable,
debian-testing, and debian-unstable repositories.
I looked over the Mancoosi project, and one of their tasks was
formalizing maintainer scripts into a DSL. I think they've stopped
(mostly), but EVOSS (the system they developed) is still up:
http://mancoosi.di.univaq.it/?page_id=36
Presumably it wouldn't be too hard to take their translator and modify
it to output in a format that Nix can read instead of whatever DSL they
came up with, and then implement whatever glue code is needed to get Nix
to understand those. After that it's a question of whether the
infrastructure is up to it; even if Nix works perfectly (which it won't;
it doesn't have any sort of SAT solver but just brute-forces things,
correct?), Hydra will run out of disk space. I expect these problems can
be mostly ignored because they're orthogonal to the actual packages.
Thoughts? Reasons this won't work that I'm missing?
-- Mathnerd314
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list