[Nix-dev] Re: deepOverride

[Michael Raskin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/11/2010 03:01 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Does someone disagree on removing deepOverrides - reimplementing its
>> usages using the new style?
> What’s the “new style”?  What’s the rationale?

The solution following the direction proposed by Eelco Dolstra, namely
using pkgsFun for correct overrides.

The rationale is removing the things that caused criticism by Eelco
Dolstra while keeping the functionality.

> Please do not take lack of reply as an OK.  I personally find your
> messages way too verbose to understand what you’re trying to solve and
> what you’re expecting from people on this list.

If people neither comment nor ask concrete clarifying questions, this is
what happens...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMOP4YAAoJEE6tnN0aWvw3HgIH/2axW3lZ7QPnz6i0QXuPSAO/
iWvSCtIrkwJ8hr1LkMvAx6IGUkd9T6UYoLETmW8J/JguhnQqW8H9pN8hKeTfj5fR
6pBxXAUh9svCn3L8y8xxARnz20Sg6+vpsmxIHH6JYgofua3rQGUGhcqZ9v23iIce
GqCDII2r4J15kV52SlbPbeiL5TM1ZFy6F60eaq268plpzs/uHa4JzYE0rjGRW4uI
tADOa5IDrJ2eIAiNgOKHJTzO97IwUQaGT/XwyHlann/x72YnBR+pk5NHZv8jqA0M
jEVi8l/+BLDhf1xP2R564MY5YjawELDrYxb/QzqRDCmOR4v4sokO0k2jEPefiQs=
=Hwz2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----