[Nix-dev] RE: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 19795 - sandervanderburg - nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native

[Sander van der Burg - EWI]

In order to fix that I have to install additional packages on that machine... hmmm...

Maybe, it's indeed better to support stdenvNix. I will look into that now...

Btw. I'm now testing on FreeBSD 8.0. I think it's also a good idea to update the FreeBSD machine.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Eelco Dolstra [mailto:e.dolstra at tudelft.nl]
Verzonden: wo 3-2-2010 22:19
Aan: nix-dev at cs.uu.nl; Sander van der Burg - EWI
Onderwerp: Re: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 19795 - sandervanderburg -	nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native
 
Hi,

Sander van der Burg wrote:

> Author: sandervanderburg
> Date: 2010-02-03 20:41:28 +0000 (Wed, 03 Feb 2010)
> New Revision: 19795
> 
> You can view the changes in this commit at:
>    https://svn.nixos.org/viewvc/nix?rev=19795&view=rev
> 
> Added:
>    nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native/derivealiases-freebsd.sh
> Modified:
>    nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native/default.nix
> 
> Log:
> Added all necessary aliases to match the Linux stdenv as closely as possible on FreeBSD

Isn't it better to just add coreutils and so on to the stdenv on FreeBSD?
(Basically, use stdenvNix on FreeBSD.)

This change breaks in our own build farm:
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/280266/nixlog/1/tail

-- 
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20100203/817a83ca/attachment.html