[Nix-dev] Re: DVCS - what we care about?
Michael Raskin
7c6f434c at mail.ru
Thu Aug 12 20:37:55 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 07:31 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Well, Git has very well-thought-through implementation. What
> > describes conceptual design of git according to your standards?
>
> why do you ask me? I didn't make any claims about Git. You did. You
> claimed that Git does not have any architecture. I'd be interested to
> hear your reasoning to back that claim up. Can you point out any
> architectural deficiencies in Git?
Well, there are no deficiency if you consider it as a high-speed
high-branch-count merge tool (and it looks like it is optimized to be
that).
If you look at it as a history storage tool, deliberate throwing away of
branch history seems enough of a deficiency.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMZD+CAAoJEE6tnN0aWvw3rpgH/2VmJXZ31auLSiS/BrD+IV+o
7u1jsPFv3VbAzEbZjCsnnioW4j3/ROpsb5T8YrbnwXK/CHA1l3wYzZL3zPUBDkE2
e/8fpSFZMfRfFb63m6GZ5s1mjsl+POsRze9+2oNz5xIAXpBekx42V+AbQ0LfFiX7
FGgHKsZmuaxmF8CPbk/gGa8fJS+1ARGGt0JF3IKW0YVhsjVE4fUkbn4aSnkGAjRP
bd+2sF+VfthZoAUrz4hXLyw8wjFxOVsJ85SlbcLacxnPpEAMRNJgQEoc6aenxDlE
ae02yA7AqZbrl5JNFaskaA5roA5B6FtbliNNzOWTkcYqAuxH+Nu9o1NUyQ1awZw=
=5Hn2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list