[Nix-dev] Re: another style proposal
Tony White
tonywhite100 at googlemail.com
Sat Apr 3 19:48:02 CEST 2010
On 3 April 2010 10:37, Yury G. Kudryashov <urkud+nix at ya.ru> wrote:
> Lluís Batlle wrote:
>
>> I prefer having an idea of the dependencies of a package in the
>> all-packages.nix file.
> It is just "an idea", not "knowledge". Even the arguments in default.nix is
> an "idea" (kdegraphics didn't use its djvulibre argument a few days ago). If
> you need all packages that depend on a specific one, use grep -r (I use git
> grep). If you want to *know* the dependencies of a specific package, look at
> buildInputs in its default.nix.
>
> Currently, we have three nearly equivalent lists:
> * arguments in all-packages.nix
> * arguments in default.nix
> * buildInputs ++ propagatedBuildInputs
>
> My style has the following advantages:
> * only two lists are needed;
> * one can write all needed overrides in "let" part of default.nix, so
> default.nix contains really all information about a package.
>
> P.S.: Please, use "list reply", not "reply to all".
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at cs.uu.nl
> https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
Hi Yury,
Confusing. No thanks. Current style is more sensible.
I object.
Thanks,
Tony
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list