[Nix-dev] Re: Separating free and non-free packages, again

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Tony White <tonywhite100 at googlemail.com> writes:

> That means that it is a free software license but in nixpkgs it should
> be classified as non-free because a module covered by the GPL and a
> module covered by the MPL cannot legally be linked together.

As long as it’s a free software license, it qualifies (to me) as, well,
free.

Ludo’.