[Nix-dev] Re: Performance impact of Nix
Eelco Dolstra
e.dolstra at tudelft.nl
Mon Aug 3 16:33:14 CEST 2009
Marc Weber wrote:
> you're aware that the system caches directory contents?
> So if you run the same command a second time everything will be faster?
A nice trick for doing somewhat deterministic I/O measurements:
$ sync
$ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
This makes the kernel throw away the pagecache etc.
> I think the more important question is: I accesing
> /EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-name
>
> faster than
> /nix/store/EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-name
> or
> /nix/store/a/b/c/d/e/f/EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-name
> ?
The former should be faster on filesystems like ext3/ext4 with b-tree / hashed
directory indices. If you don't have that, directory lookups will take O(n)
time, which is obviously bad if you have a large Nix store. (On the other hand,
the OS is likely to cache the directory contents, so it will only be slow the
first time.)
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
More information about the nix-dev
mailing list